GM-FREE IRELAND

Proceedings of the Green Ireland Conference • Kilkenny Castle, 16-18 June 2006


Green Ireland programme
Muiris Kennedy

Speech by
Muiris Kennedy & follow-up discussion with conference participants

Muiris Kennedy is Director of Corporate Marketing Services and Small Business at Bord Bía (the Irish Food Board) - the state agency responsible for the trade and market development of Irish food, drink and horticulture. Website: www.bordbia.ie

Bord Bía agreed to provide €1,000 in sponsorship for this conference, but cancelled its agreement after receiving an email from a biotech industry lobbyist in Canada accusing Bord Bía of "using tax payers money to support a view thatÝis contrary to the official position of the Irish Government"!

This is the verbatim transcript of an audio recording of Muiris's speech and a follow-up discussion with conference participants, during which he publicly accepted an invitation to facilitate a high-level discussion on the economic risks of GM contamination for key players in the Irish food and farming sectors. But he subsequently denied this in response to more pressure from the same industry lobbyist.

Bord Bía has been criticised for failing to address the contamination of Irish food with GM ingredients, either directly or via the animal food chain, and thus causing loss of market share for Irish food exports. Muiris makes no mention of this in his speech, but you can jump directly to the follow up discussion below, where he and conference participants address this issue which relates directly to Bord Bia's marketing of Irish food under the brand of Ireland – the food island.

Fáilte Ireland (the Irish Tourism Board) has since commissioned the Tourism Research Centre at the Dublin Institute of Technology to conduct research to ascertain whether the introduction of GM crop farming in Ireland would lead to a change in visitor perceptions of Ireland as a "clean, green" destination. The research includes face-to-face interviews with overseas visitors to Ireland during the period July - November, 2006. The preliminary findings from the visitor attitude survey will be presented at an Expert Review panel drawing together key individuals with expertise in the areas of GMO, tourism, food and destination management, who will meet to further inform this process on 19 October 2006. This Expert Panel will be facilitated by Dr Sheila Flanagan, Head of School of Hospitality Management and Tourism, DIT. The findings of this research will form the basis for a position paper on the issue.

Muiris accompanied his speech with the PowerPoint presentation Marketing of Irish Food which you can download here as a large 9.9 MB ppt file.

Numbered footnotes in the text refer to the endnotes at the bottom of this web page.



Part 1: speech

Note: You can also download this speech + discussion as a printer-friendly 688 kb PDF file.

[I would like to talk about] one of our most traditional industries – and one of our most important indigenous industries – which is the food industry. Em, and I think what I'll do if you can bear with me, I'll just talk a bit about what we do – Bord Bía, the Irish Food Board – I'll talk a bit about the marketing environment, in terms of what consumers are looking for out in the marketplace. I think a lot of them, we were, we touched on a lot of them this afternoon when we were looking at Dorothy's film [i.e. Deborah Koons Garcia's film The Future of Food] [1] and whatever; and maybe then about how we go positioning Ireland – as exports are so important to us – in the international arena. So that's the kind of agenda.

Firstly, Board Bía. We're the state agency responsible for the trade, market development of Irish food and drink and horticulture. We're focused purely on the demand side – what the market wants – and we operate mainly in export markets, although we do have a role in the domestic market here in Ireland.

Eh, we have, em, we've a number of offices around the world – we have nine – mainly in Europe, but we do have one in the US and Russia – basically where our most important markets are.

Eh, and our mission is to drive the success of a world-class Irish food & drink and horticulture industry by providing market development services and promotion to our clients, who are, eh, largely Irish-based clients. Em, that's us, that's Bord Bía, yeah.

I suppose very briefly – for those of you who weren't from Ireland – the food industry is our most important what we call indigenous industry. I know it's a terrible word, but it's our native industry, it's our most important one. It, it accounts for about € 18 - 19 billion in, kind of, turnover – which is a very significant figure – 50% of which we export. So we export a lot of what we, what we produce. It accounts for about 9% of our Gross Domestic Product, 8% of industrial employment, and about 25% of our net foreign earnings. Eh, so it's very important, particularly for our rural economy. A lot of the, if you like, the, the, em, if you like, the, the, em, sources of our agricultural produce, the, the products, originate here in Ireland, so from an added-value perspective, it's very important.

Ah, in terms of, of, of the, em, our exports, we export as I said roughly 50% of what we produce. We are the biggest exporter of beef in the Northern Hemisphere; we export 90% of what we produce, so if you were an economist you'd say we are 1,010 per cent self-sufficient in beef. Eh, so we are a very important exporter in beef and dairy produce. Eh, we mainly export to Europe and to the UK. We do separate out the two; because traditionally we would have 80% of our, or our exports would have gone to our closest neighbour which was the United Kingdom. Eh, but since we joined Europe in 1973 we've been diversifying, spreading the risk, so we export now about 20 - 30% to Europe – which is interesting enough because, I suppose, we're still largely dependent on two non-Eurozone sterling and the dollar area, so we have to juggle around in terms of, of, eh, competitiveness.

So basically we export to about 160 countries; em, the UK is our most important market, followed by Europe and international markets which would include countries like the United States, Middle East, Russia, whatever. So that's a kind of a quick cycle around the, the export markets.

In terms of the sectors, dairy and meat are our two most important sectors. Em, they would – between them – represent over 50% in terms of outputs and in terms of exports. But increasingly the more important sectors – the prepared food area which is about 21% of our export, but that's growing significantly, whereas the dairy and meat sectors are likely to remain, eh, roughly around the same. There are quotas, there's restrictions in terms of the amounts, the outputs that we can increase production. So you're going to see growth in the prepared food sector, that's our high-growth area, that's doubled in size in the last five years, and that's likely to continue to do so over the next five years.

Eh, the Demon Drink – em, we have three or four of the biggest global brands here in Ireland: Baileys (I'm sure you've had the opportunity from overseas to taste the Baileys), Guinness, Jameson – we have a number of very big global brands here in Ireland [2]. But there is an even more important, next generation of younger drinks companies just coming up through the system, the likes of First Ireland Spirit; we have a lot of smaller companies who are, if you like, learning from the experience of these bigger global companies who are small niche players but equally doing very well in, em, European markets.

Eh, I won't dwell too much longer in terms of the sectors, but drink is a very important export, eh, for Ireland. It's probably better known as a drink island than as a food island, but we won't go into that!

Em, the marketing environment: I mean we touched briefly on that today. What are consumers looking for and what's driving the food industry? Em, I mean there are, kind of, no, no surprises, em, certainly with this relentless drive for convenience. And I suppose even Ireland has joined this since the Celtic Tiger. They were thinking of, of, em, looking at – anecdotally – changing the national symbol of Ireland from the shamrock to the construction crane – we've been doing so well over the last five years, that, em, certainly population is growing. Even the population of Kilkenny – another interesting figure – in 2002, in County Kilkenny was 82,000. That's the same number that the total population of Ireland grew in 2004, so every three or four years we're adding another County's population to what we've got. So the significant growth in population, and this is driving this whole business of convenience, more women working in the, in the workforce. We've, em, now introduced dashboard dining into our culture, em, for those of us driving around the city, the M50, constant traffic, whatever, so we're becoming more and more like most other modern advanced, em.

Here are some of the kind of things, if you like, that are impacting on food choices. Eh, mm, I won't go through them all because it's a little too late in the evening, it's a bit like an eye test with all those numbers. But briefly, em, in terms of what are, what are driving consumers, in terms of convenience – usually hard pressed, time-pressed, cash-rich – eh, but it's convenience, basically. Em, most people don't know what they're going to have for dinner by four o'clock in the afternoon. So it's all about convenience, about convenience stores, it's shopping late, and things that can be prepared, eh, relatively quickly. Eh, I think the average now is down to about 10 minutes is the average preparation time for, for meals in Ireland. It's gone down from 20 to 10.

Em, and I think people are craving to get more back into more traditional, but there isn't time: time is the big, em, the big issue.

We've moved from convenience to this thing about health and well-being. Eh, It's very important in terms of the role of food has on our health and well-being. Em, and we are what we eat, and the importance of diet on our whole life style.

We carried out some further research. Sorry, I should have mentioned here, we do a comparative study every two years on the relative attitudes to, em, food, shopping, and a number of items, between Ireland – that's ROI / Republic of Ireland – Great Britain, and Northern Ireland, and there are significant variations. It's to help our manufacturers to say "Well look, it's not a big homogeneous market, there are differences", so we kind of, we did this, a national study we do every two, three years, over a thousand households, a thousand households, so it's relatively robust in terms of scientific, eh, in terms of, of statistics, so, eh, but there are differences between Ireland, between Northern Ireland and Southern Ireland and Great Britain, and this kind of helps to highlight kind of where those, those differences are.

But nonetheless, in terms of the Republic of Ireland, we are more and more concerned about, em, what we eat, the origin of our, of our food, where it comes from – moreso than they are in the UK. I suppose it could be associated with our agricultural background: we're basically an agricultural country, whatever. So, em, I think people are more and more conscious of the impact food has on your wellbeing, your life, your mental health as well. So we're picking this up more and more as we do our, em, our, our research.

Em, now. Good food can enhance my, yes I think this, again, the same topic, em, body and mind: what you eat. You see all these, particularly a lot of the food manufacturers now moving into, kind of, "functional foods", functionality, em, and I think that people, consumers are much more concerned about what's in the food, who produces it, where it comes from, probiotics, all of this functionality in foods is driving a lot of the growth in the food industry. Eh, and I think more recently this, the impact that food has on your mental health as well. So your, your, this is driving a lot of the trends in the food business.

Em, OK, some of the other things that we, we again, it's trying to track the attitudes of consumers and it's, kind of, quite difficult to do, we're noticing this, kind of, schizophrenic behaviour which is a bit like what we call "splurge and purge" culture where we're having consumers treating themselves to indulgent products – there's a lot of growth in that whole kind of indulgence speciality area, which is not necessarily the most healthy food, but people like to treat themselves. At the same time they are looking at price, they are looking at trading down in terms of getting better value for the standard grocery items. It's about price, eh, when you're thinking about basic commodities, whereas you can treat yourself when you want to, to have something special. Eh, I mean a lot of the grocery market is driven largely on price, I mean part of Dorothy's film [i.e. Deborah's] there mentioned about concentration in, in retailing taking place around the world; it's no different, the only difference in Ireland is we have a kind of, well we used to have a Groceries Orders Act which was a bit restrictive, that's been dismantled, but we do have planning restrictions, so although they changed the laws on planning, we won't have a Wal-Mart in Ireland for a considerable number of years.

We have a huge number of what we call convenience stores, and Ireland leads the way in smaller convenience-type stores. So, I was talking at a conference last month in Dublin about, about convenience stores; we had people from all over the world coming to see us, look, there is an alternative method to the big black box, so, so, we're, we're leading the way in terms of, of retail in the convenience, the whole convenience area.

So, em, OK, I think, more and more people are looking for value for money. Em, and that's driven a lot of this, the, the introduction of discounters to the Irish market; it's a relatively new phenomenon for us; but we do, five years ago there were no discounters. That's interesting because the Celtic Tiger has never been as strong, we've never had so much money: how come the discounters were able to penetrate the Irish market? Because in general Irish consumers tend to be less price-sensitive – in general. However, there is an increasing kind of, I suppose, assertiveness with, with consumers about how they spend their money and they are, as I say, they are trading up to the more expensive products at the same time as they want better value.

The, most of the big multiple retailers would be, would be, eh, positioning themselves on price, eh, although, em, they sell their, their, if you like, their, their, their, their story on price but nonetheless when they, when they get you in the store they look to, kind of, get more, eh, kind of, purchasing power out of you by trading up to other areas.

There was a, a, a, price battle on in the UK last year I think for frozen food. You could buy a frozen ready-meal in Tesco I think it was for £0.99 – less than a, less than a pound – and the price of a premium dog food in the same store was £1.20! So this thing about price is largely driven by the big global, the Wal-Marts of this world. However I don't think, we haven't quite come to that stage yet in Ireland.

What we are picking up as well is people, consumers are much more aware, they're much better educated, and we, we're not quite turning into food snobs but we certainly are connoisseurs, at least in some sectors. Take for example again in Ireland, farmhouse cheese. We now have a kind of a 50 or 60 portfolio of local farmhouse cheeses, from raw milk, to goat's cheese, to sheep's cheese. This would have all been, happened in the last 10 years. So more and more people are becoming interested in the food that they eat and how they buy it, the shopping experience, you know. Generally, multiple retailers and shopping around is not a, is kind of a boring task that we have to go through. So, but more and more people are looking to, to enjoy the experience of shopping – hence the growth of farmers markets and alternative methods of buying food.

Eh, and the rituals then about consumption: you know, trying to sit down at, family meals are declining around the world so there, really, we're noticing now there is a growth in what they call in the food service sector, "eating in is eating out", you know. It's a treat night to eat in, so eating in has become the new eating out.

Em, local produce: again this is happening throughout the world. In Ireland in the last five or six years we've seen an explosion in the growth in the number of farmers markets. I saw some figure in Dorothy's [i.e. Deborah's] film about, I've forgotten, the US market. It's, well it's similar here in Ireland. We've over 100 farmers markets now operating throughout the country. And it's growing. And there is more and more of an interest in, em, where the produce comes from, em, who produces it, how is it produced, and what protocol are they using. And we're, the Irish consumer is very aware of these, em, trends – as are other, other countries around Europe. But this is, I suppose, transparency is what they're looking for.

Ah, mentioned there I think, Glenisk [3], one of the organic companies that is using this kind of, if you like, the organic company, very successful company. Now they're, they're supplying local producers but they are also supplying multiple retailers, and doing extremely well in the UK market, a bit market for... The problem with Ireland is it's a relatively small market; 4 million people. If you want to get scale, and be successful in the food business you have to be able to export. So companies like GleniskÖ There's another company here in Kilkenny, Milleven Foods, a very good company, they have a range of confectionary products and do extremely well, positioned wholly naturally and produced locally, whatever. That's another product, a sheep's cheese product from Co. Cavan.

But I'd say, the whole, eh, eh, consumers are looking for this, going back to Mother Nature as the, the kind of touchstone for, for reference.

So OK: what does Bord Bía do? How do we use that in terms of, if you like, reassuring consumers? Now they want reassurance on traceability, and they want, eh, you know, who produced it, and they want to be able to identify with those people. We have a, a scheme, it's mainly for meat, eggs, and, and some dairy products, the Quality Assured scheme [4], which goes on all the packs, to assure them that this product is, is been quality assured from the farm right through to the retailer. But most other countries, em, you'll find for the principal commodity areas, will have a similar scheme, quality assured scheme.

Em, the other big trend – I suppose it's not different in Ireland – would be the role of the, the celebrity chef, if that's the right word, if they can call them celebrity chefs. In Ireland we have Nevin McGuire [5] up in Blacklion, who's, em, and then there's the next generation of Allens [6], there's Rachel Allen and, em, whatever. These people would have a huge influence on food and fashion, and they're introducing, if you like, a lot of the, the changes that are taking place. And the likes of Nevin would be big into using local regional produce in all of his recipes, in all of his programmes, and his restaurant, a very successful restaurant. And of course Jamie Oliver [7] who's changed the, the whole face of, of food in, in schools in the British school system. So they have a huge influence in, in the whole, kind of, em, in food, in changing food.

The other interesting thing again mentioned in Dorothy's [i.e. Deborah's] film was this using your wallets now to save the world. There is a kind of a growth in this. It's only beginning to catch on here in Ireland in terms of ethics, in terms of purchasing. And, em, we've had the fair trade kind of approach, em, I mean, there's an Irish company uses that, that fair trade that they're sourcing all their coffee and tea from proper, kind of, em, ethical sources or whatever.

And there's a company there in Athboy, in Meath, called, em, I think they call themselves South Hill Enterprises, who again, they use mentally handicapped people in all of their production that they use, and, em, they're, they're basically all of their profits go back into, into the local community. So the, we are more and more seeing this, this ethics creeping into purchasing. Now it's a small section of the market, but it is a trend nonetheless. I think consumers like to feel that they're doing something good when they're purchasing.

OK, that's a kind of a quick cycle around, not all the trends by any means, but just to give you a taste for some of them.

And then I suppose how do we, how does Bord Bía operate? Particularly in international markets. We developed what we call a tactical brand. As we are an island, we call it "Ireland – the food island". And, em, again the, it's green, obviously, the green island, and the blue raindrop, I suppose, to signify the gentle rainfall in Ireland – although we do know that it does, it does rain quite a lot. The, anecdotally, they say the birds don't sing in Ireland, they cough! But, however, that stops at the end of May. But we use this, em, again, Ireland is a small country, we don't have a huge budget in Bord Bía, we're 90 people. Eh, we have, em, I think around € 28 million in total for the entire organisation, and we don't have a big spend relative to any of the big brand companies, so we have to effectively use our funds as efficiently as we can.

So we developed this tactical brand, and we would use it in terms of positioning Ireland, em, you know, Ireland being the natural green country. Eh, the perception in Europe – it's quite low, the perception is it's, it's a green island, em, not a lot of people, em – and we kind of trade on the, on the back of that. Em, however, eh, we've done some work recently about, I think, authentic Irish ingredients. Ireland is an island of regions, it's an island of, we have a – sorry, it's a bit of an eye test, I know there's a lot up there, but if anybody would like a copy of that, I should have brought some down. Actually we have this map we've developed in conjunction with John McKenna, em, which looks at all the ingredients around. Perhaps we've forgotten about them, even within Ireland.

They are available: from wild Irish salmon in West Cork [8], eh, raw milk cheese [9], right up to boxty [10] in Cavan [11]. So every, every County in Ireland has a distinctive, eh, kind of ingredient, eh, that adds kind of value to, and contributes to the story about Ireland being a, an island of regions. So we've been doing some work on that whole area, trying to get, if you like, people, new producers to come in to the market as well.

There's about 300, about, small producers which would haveÖ When I came into this in Bord Bía – it was set up 10 years ago – there were about 60. So they, they've, exponential growth in this whole area. We have a large number of small producers who are very good, and who are great ambassadors for the food industry. So if anyone wants a copy of that, Ireland – the food island, the map [12], maybe I'll send it to you Michael and we could circulate it to anyone who attended the conference, it might be of some interest.

Em, OK. Building markets in terms of using, the positioning Ireland as the natural pure ingredients, we use that very effectively, particularly in what would you call the commodity areas of... It doesn't translate into benefits when you're talking about pizzas, green isle pizzas, whatever, prepared foods – I mean, positioning of Goodfellows is, they're Italian. So, but, however in these – the most important sectors from, from Irish, would be meat and dairy – we would use this positioning of Ireland the green island very very forcefully. We're not the only ones doing it, mind you. Every other country maintains that they are, they are pure. But we would say, "look grass-fed Irish beef is fed on grass" [13], and not many other countries can allow their cattle to graze openly. It's all usually done internally in lots or whatever [14]. Eh, and the quality of the, the eating quality arising from that is superior to other, to other, eh, countries. It's also Quality Assured, which again consumers need, and it's also competitive in price. You have to meet all of those criteria to be able to penetrate the European market, which is very competitive, you know.

Here again just looking at it there, we would be one of 200 countries all exhibiting at, say, the big trade fair, Nuga, RCA, and we have to, kind of, get some, get a, we have to get some identity: we have to shout louder and, and higher than other countries. We don't have the same budget, but this is how we use, again, the Ireland – the food island branding to get, stand out, to get some recognition in a very crowded kind of area. So we use it, again, the green, eh, positioning Ireland as kind of unique and different, as an island as well.

Em, here again is one of the, eh, a particular promotion we did in, in France on beef. And, and, eh, it's interesting that the French are very, eh, xenophobic about everything – food that's produced in France is the best! But nonetheless in more recent years we've been, been, em, making good success in penetrating the FrenchÖ again, using Ireland – the green island and that as a kind of tactical positioning.

In Italy – Italy is our biggest, curiously, our biggest market for Irish beef [15], outside of the UK. The Italians love Irish beef and they also have a great attraction for Ireland. We used, we had a big campaign around busses and trams in Milan and that's one of them. You probably can't see it out, anyway, em, it's the green pasture, eh, and the, the superior taste – unique taste was the theme that we used.

Em, something, I just, kind of, maybe to sum up if I could, I'm, em – I've been jumping around here a little bit – but just to give you a taste for what we're doing in terms of international market, we would have a very small share – outside of the UK, that is – we'd have a very small share of any of the European or international markets, so we have to fight very hard to maintain, to give our, to get outlets for our food manufacturers. And we have a number of initiatives that we do, that we, mainly focused on trade. We try and get trade buyers, and that would be retail buyers, food service buyers and distributors. We do very little, we don't have the funding, to, to convince consumers, European consumers, about Irish, so we focus on the trade. Most of our, eh, marketing initiatives are trade-focused.

And we would have things like the International Speciality Food Forum we had last month in Kilmainham; we had 150 buyers, we brought them in to Ireland to a similar location as this, a historic location. We had 85 companies, and they, we introduced the buyers to the, em, to the individual companies. And we had 800 meetings I think on the one day. It was, it gave a whole new meaning to speed dating! So, but that's the type of initiative we have to get people to come in to Ireland. Because we're an island, it's a bit of a disadvantage when you're talking about proximity to markets, so we have to work that bit harder.

Em, we also have a scheme – Féile Bía [16] – which is trying to promote and help, em, produce here in Ireland, with food service, with hotels, and restaurants, whatever, that they use what we say, Quality Approved Scheme. A lot of imports come into food service, so at the same time within Europe you're not allowed, kind of, say "Look, Irish beef is better" or, you know, you can't use comparative in marketing in Europe because... But we have this scheme, at least as long as the food comes from a Quality, a recognized Quality Assured Scheme, then you're a member of this club, Féile Bía.

Em, we participate at most of the big kind of international events. And for us, I think, this year one of our biggest sponsorship ever is the Ryder Cup. For those golfers here today, this is the biggest sporting occasion that Ireland has ever staged, or will ever stage. So, so it's a very important event for Ireland. Eh, and we're one of the sponsors along with the tourist body, eh, – Waterford, oh no, I think they dropped out – eh, AIB, the, and one of the banks. We're one of the main sponsors. And the, this image Ireland – the food island – will be beamed around the world when the Ryder Cup comes here in September. I think the audience is over 1 billion people, so we're using it, again, to project Ireland as a food island as well as a good kind of tourist destination. We're again using that to bring in, em, top buyers from all over the world, eh, to meet Irish companies, and using golf as a kind of bit of leverage. You wouldn't, wouldn't require too much leverage to come to Ireland for the Ryder Cup, I imagine. We probably get a, we have a, a very good response to that campaign.

So that kind of gives a bit of a taste for what we're doing. I, I mean, I could spend the rest of the evening here going through the detail, but I think Michael just wanted, em, a flavour for what, for how we, we use Ireland, how we promote Ireland, how we position Ireland, eh, again, with the background of food.

Thank you very much.

[Applause]


Part 2: follow-up discussion with conference participants

Michael O'Callaghan (conference chair):

Since you have to leave soon, Muiris, can you stay for another five minutes or so?

Muiris Kennedy:

Sure, yeah!

Michael O'Callaghan:

Because I'm sure there are some people who would love to just ask you a few questions.

Muiris Kennedy:

Absolutely.

Michael O'Callaghan:

Fr. Seán?

Fr. Seán McDonagh, SSC: [17]

I've worked in Asia for many many years. What about the Chinese, Japanese, South Koreans markets?

Muiris Kennedy:

Yes, I kind of skipped over it there. The, the, em, Europe, eh, the UK, Europe, one of the most important growth markets is, em, China. We, we've just, em, appointed someone who's going to be based in Shanghai, eh, as a market of long-term opportunity. It certainly is going to be the, eh, the market, eh, longer term, for Ireland – difficult market, but you're quite right, eh, em, we've identified that as well.

A forest of hands, my goodness!

Pauric Cannon (Development Coordinator, Dublin Food Coop): [18]

Muiris, there's something I'd like to ask you: what are you doing about promoting Ireland as a GM-free source of food, and also of Irish organic food?

Muiris Kennedy:

Again as I said, look, at the very outset, I mean, we're, em, the, the market promotion development agency. In terms of regulation, in terms of GM, we don't have a, kind of, a position. That's our department, our relevant department, eh, eh, of AgÖ They determine the policy for, for Ireland in terms of GM [19].

So, but we're, we are looking at a very small share of a, of a huge European market. In China they probably, they don't even know where Ireland is, eh. But what we would be positioning is, look, we've got a, a very good portfolio of about 300 companies who can supply, em, into what consumers are looking for. I'm not saying that we use it a positioning statement, we use natural, eh, and if they're organic, but we don't necessarily, if you like, use the, the thing that we're a GM-free country as a, as a kind of aÖ And we spoke, Dorothy [i.e. Deborah Koons Garcia] and I spoke about this. The awareness about GM, in Europe it's quite high [20]. And there aren't any, any retailers who will, who would even list products that are GM [21].

It's different in the US, you know [22]. But we would, we have companies, a portfolio of companies and we market those as effectively as we can. But we don't particularly go out kind of saying "this is a GM-free island" or whatever [23]. It's not one of the positioning strategies. But certainly, natural, island, eh, yes.

Michael O'Callaghan:

I think it would be fair to say that the, obviously the Department of Agriculture and the Irish Government have a very strong pro-GM policy [24]; on the other hand, eh, for example, members of Féile Bía like the Restaurants Association [25] and the leading chefs [26] are opposed to GM, so Bord Bía is kind of stuck in the middle. You don't make policy, but then it's obvious there is a growing market for GM-free food.

In connection with that, I have a question: you were talking about the Quality Assured Scheme. Is that a, are the criteria for that set, determined here in Ireland, or is it part of a kind of European-wide thing?

Muiris Kennedy:

Well they'd be all, they'd be linked into the EN45011 which is the kind of internationally recognised quality approved scheme. Em, but our one, actually, as well as, em, approving the processors, it now goes back to farm level. We we'll be doing 14,000 farm inspections this year, so, so it goes right back to theÖ

Michael O'Callaghan:

Are the criteria – the objective criteria for measuring the quality or evaluating the quality – not determined by the Irish government, or are they partially determined by it?

Muiris Kennedy:

I suppose it's determined by industry, and, em, but the retail sector as well would have an influence in that. But it's recognized internationally. I mean you have, most countries have, have their own scheme. So it would be on a par, and probably better than a lot of, I know the UK have the BRC – the British Retail Consortia, eh, our, the scheme that we run is far superior to that, because it, they only, eh, they only screen or they only assess, they only assess the processor, they don't go back to the, at farm gates, so our, our scheme is much more thorough.

Michael O'Callaghan:

Is there any, eh, I mean, can, could food consisting of, you know, that contains genetically modified ingredients be approved with this Quality Assured Scheme at the moment?

Muiris Kennedy:

Mmmh, I mean labeling is an issue [27]. And that's, I think, the legislators are, are introducing, kind of, you must label the products properly [28]. And there, Ireland I think is leading, kind of, the, the Europe in that and we're pushing very strong for proper labeling, for proper origin of the product as well. Because a lot of stuff still comes in [29].

Eh, in terms of, ah, well I know there was a recent case last week there with the Food Safety Authority who looked at a number of honey companies around Ireland and discovered that, to their horror, that three or four of them were misrepresenting the fact that it was pure Irish honey. It was, em, a mixture of, em, it came from around the world and whatever [30]. Although one of the best companies is here in Kilkenny, Mileeven, they weren't involved in that, they are very good company.

Michael O'Callaghan:

There is Canadian honey made from genetically modified oilseed rape being imported in Ireland. They filter out the pollen so that it passes the test as not GM, and they they dump a bucket of Irish honey into it with Irish pollen, and then pass it off as Irish honey. [31]

Any other questions for Bord Bía?

Mary [woman in audience]:

The live exports, animals, live animal exports: I'm particularly interested in that subject. Has your organization any interest in trying to, I mean if you kill an animal before you export it, the value added is considerable. Why do we keep exporting these animals, and they have more dreadful journey to get there, and then when they do get there they have a most dreadful death?

Muiris Kennedy:

Well I'm not saying again, it's a policy decision in terms of allowing, eh, eh, exports, mmh, live exports, that's a, eh, however I would say that in principle, Mary, the, we would much prefer to see the added value happening here in Ireland because jobs and job creation. However the farming community, on the other hand, maintain that if they don't have an outlet – another outlet other than going to the processor – that they're being, they're being squeezed on price, and therefore they have to, eh, they have to have an additional outlet. So there's two sides. But in principle, if we can add the value here, eh, it's, eh, it's better, yeah, absolutely.

Frank Corcoran (Vice President, European Environment Bureau [32], and Chair, An Taisce [33]):

The five thousand members of An Taisce voluntarily monitor the quality of rivers, lakes, air, soil, even dioxins that might land in plants, and are very vigilant on not allowing incinerators from which dioxins land in food etc, which would make an impact.

What would be the impact for Bord Bía if Ireland lost this image that it is a green clean island, what effect would it have on Bord Bía?

Muiris Kennedy:

Obviously, it, it, not only with food but with tourism as well, it would have a, would have a significant effect, eh, obviously.

Em, now I think we still have a good reputation out there [34]. We're still relatively small, I mean four million people, and very big landmass, and I know that you're very active in another organization there as well, insuring we don't get a bad reputation and whatever. But it would be, it would certainly not help the international image of, mind you, eh, I have to say as well – and I've lived and worked overseas – that the image of Ireland, curiously, even beyond Britain, even in some areas, is very very low, it's very hazy, exactly what Ireland is and where it is, and so, I know we're very close to it emotionally ourselves but really, eh, we have a tough job. We spend most of our time telling buyers about where Ireland is, and what's our capability. And once you've got over that, eh, eh, but no, your point is, is obviously valid. I mean we do, and we bring in a lot of people to show them, you know, how good we are at producing food and what a great kind of country it is and how natural it is and whatever. But it's a point that, em, it's a point that, a valid point. We wouldn't like to lose that, certainly not [35].

Woman in audience:

The food pyramid [36] has had a tremendous influence on Irish health and life. Em, I think the general populace is much more aware of healthy food than it is given credit for. The Irish breakfasts now are more cereal-based than, than meat-based, em, sausages etc, except people on holiday. And, em, just your point about supermarkets. Em, men love supermarkets. If you got to a supermarket now you find men wandering around doing their shopping. And another point about hotels: when you go abroad, any of the hotels abroad you will have the traditional bacon and sausage etc., it doesn't matter where you are, Madrid of wherever, you will have what they call an Irish breakfast. On the side they have a continental-type breakfast with the cheese and the meats and all the rest of it. So there's a tremendous market for that, and you knowÖ

Muiris Kennedy:

Yep. Just on your point about shopping. I mean the – again we could be here all night with – but one of the areas we would look at each year is the attitudes to cooking and the attitudes to shopping. But our, our kind of research would suggest that, em, you don't, we don't have any serial men shoppers knocking around. Still, in general it's still the response of the, of females, even despite the fact that there's more women working in the workforce, it's still largely, now largely, the responsibility of, of females in terms of that decision-making. Now you will see more men wandering – wandering around is the right word, probably, you know – but eh, eh, this whole kind of changing demographics is having an impact on the food industry. We have a new, you know, we categorise the consumers into A B, the high rollers, but there's a new category now, I think in England and Ireland, called the Slops. Have any of you heard of the Slops? That's the Singles Living Off the Parents, you know. More and more people staying at home for longer time, and these are kind of, you know, convenience junkies, you know; they have no interest in food, eh, and they're – that's partially in Ireland because of the cost of housing – it's difficult to set up on your own or whatever, but anyway you can't get them off the payroll, they're home now till they're thirty five, you know, ha ha ha, anyway.

Michael O'Callaghan:

Just a couple of more questions.

Old farmer in audience:

In the case of horticultural productionÖ with the widespread use of pesticides [37], and in some cases of artificial fertilizers [38], do you think there is damage done as far as health is concerned to the product that's produced? And if you do think that there is damage done, could it be publicized in such a way, for two reasons. One, to prevent the people from buying the adulterated product, and encourage organic production? I think there should be some sort of a proof, an assurance scheme about organic production. Is green good? Could you answer that?

Muiris Kennedy:

Just on the issue of horticulture, yes there is a Quality Assured scheme for horticultural produce in Ireland, and a lot of the growers are members of that particular association, which will give, which validates the production protocols or whatever [39]. Now it doesn't cover all sectors. On the organic front, certainly, I mean, there is a huge, if you like, development and interest amongst consumers about organic produce or whatever. Now I have to say as well, another, some other research we did is that there are confused, consumers in general are a bit confused about organics. What exactly is organics? What is natural? What is local? There's a kind of a, a little little bit of misunderstanding out there. Now, the, and, I'm not saying that this a conscious thing of the organisations involved, but there's a number of organisations, different organisations involved in, in kind of organics [40], and I think consumers are a little bit confused as to what is, eh, a pure organic product, when isn't it organic, when is it, is it natural organic? But nonetheless, all of this, these categories are benefiting from, consumers do want to, to source these type of products. And I know there's a national organics, we've a Council, and I think ehÖ

Old farmer in audience:

Many years ago I was convinced myself that the widespread use of many of these pesticides in vegetable production – like in onion production, and in potatoes – that it was goingÖ

Muiris Kennedy:

I'm just not competent to answer that, maybe you should ask some of the doctors about that.

Michael O'Callaghan:

We can talk about that with the rest of the panel in a few moments. There's another question over here.

John Brennan (Chair, Western Organic Network [41] and Manager of the Leitrim Organic Farmers Coop [42]):

Muiris, you know who I am. We've sent Irish beef, organic beef [43] through Slaney Foods [44] to Tesco [45] in the UK. It's Quality Assured through Bord Bía's Quality Assured scheme. We feel it's very high quality, the ultimate, the highest quality product coming off the island. Also yesterday, we invited Rory Fanning from Slaney Foods here. And he came along, as he said, to get more information on the issues surrounding GM and the implications it has, or could have potentially, for our exports.

And could I put it, to maybe Bord Bía, that maybe as part of looking to the future, em, of food coming of this island, that we get the key people from the food industry – I'm talking about people from the likes of Slaney, ICM, Glanbia, and so on – to sit down with Bord Bía and other interested parties, and look at what the implications would be for the markets, and for the use of GM feed [46] in livestock production systems generally, to try and get some, at least, discussion going?

Because without getting a discussion going, we'll be here in another three or five year's time still uninformed. And I think what's really concerning me, is that the people who are making up the volume of adding to our gross national product, our domestic product there in terms of exports, know very little about what the implications of the use of genetically modified organisms are in agriculture today. So could I just put it to you that there needs to be some forum where the industry can get together and sit down and discuss these issues in a rational way, and try and come up with a coherent policy to deal with them in the future?

Muiris Kennedy:

Yes, that's a good point John. There is an organic market development group [47], eh, established. I don't know if you're probably a member of that, John, you are, yes? And that is a, if you like, there's a structure there, and I certainly, when I go backÖ

Michael O'Callaghan:

It goes way beyond organic! [48] We're talking about mainstream conventional farmingÖ

Muiris Kennedy:

Yes, but maybe there's an established group which consists of growers, the, the, Bord Bía, the Department or whatever, at least there's a, there's a formal structure there, and we're members of that and certainly I would start there, John, and, and I can follow up with you afterwards about that particular initiative, yeah. Now, eh, it's a good idea.

John Brennan:

Yes, I think so. But we need to get to a stage where we get that particular issue onto the agenda of that group. And to date we're finding it difficult to engage with the people from the various Government Departments and that, on the particular GM issue, so I think, that was what I was saying: we need to have an industry discussion with the representatives that are making the vast majority of agricultural decisions on this.

Muiris Kennedy:

Anything I can do, I'll follow up with you on that directly [49]. There is a thing just generally about the organic – and John would know better than most – but the terms of pricing differentials, they are diminishing, em, as organics become more into the, part of the mainstream categories. Eh, I mean they started out, you know, on their own in kind of separate areas, but more and more now you're seeing, emÖ There was a big debate on whether organic should have its own category. Eh, and what's happening now, seems to happen now, is that they're just becoming more and more into the mainstream and therefore that's putting, kind of, pressure on the price differential to come down towards the more, the mainstream products. It's just like a new formula, a new variety. So that's, that's a big issue, and I know, John, you're conscious of that, as we all are. So it's more expensive to produce organic produce, yet it's been pitched, you know, into the same category with three or four other products being compared on price, whatever, so, so that's a, there's a bigger issue in there that we all have to tackle. And we, unfortunately I don't know what the answer to that one is, but anyway, sorryÖ

Michael O'Callaghan:

I just have a comment: it's very important for conventional farmers and food producers to understand that GM is an issue that is already having a price differential in their sectors [50]. It's not just an organic issue! And the biotech industry [51], and the biotech industry spin-doctors [52], and – I must say, members of the Irish Government who are involved in policy-making [53] – have, in my view done a great disservice to the conventional farming and food producing sector by mis-representing the GM issue as something which is only of concern to organic producers. You lose your certification, but it's only them. For example, we were at a, there was a discussion on the ethics of food, or bioethics, run by the Royal Irish Academy [54] in Dawson Street a couple of years ago, and the head of Monsanto Ireland [55] was asked "Do you not admit that if GM crops come in, contamination will happen, and that organic farmers would sooner or later – probably quite soon – go out of business because they will lose their certification?" And he gave this extraordinary response, publicly, in front of the whole room. He said "Yes, if GM comes in, when it comes in, organic farmers will be contaminated and they will go out of business, but it doesn't matter, because organic farmers are such a small sector of the economy!"

Muiris Kennedy:

Yes, I hear that.

Michael O'Callaghan:

You know so it'sÖ I mean, I'm really glad that you came because we've been trying to engage a discussion on this issue with the Department [of Agriculture and Food] [56]. I'd like to express to you my personal view, that represents the view of most of the, all of the 110 organisations and their 32,000 members that are in the GM-free Ireland Network [57].

We are absolutely outraged at the Irish government for its position [58]. No offence to you, but I meanÖ

Muiris Kennedy:

I mean, I'm, I'm kind of the monkey, it's the organ-grinder you want to get at, sorry [laughter]!

Michael O'Callaghan:

Ö Fianna Fáil promised they would never allow GM in, at allÖ [59]

Muiris Kennedy:

Yes.

Michael O'Callaghan:

Ö and then they started voting for it completely. So they lied! [60]

Muiris Kennedy:

Yeah.

Michael O'Callaghan:

The Minister for Agriculture went through the motions of a public consultation process [61] that we regard as totally undemocratic, and completely failing to abide by the ideas of the Aarhus Convention [62] for engaging the citizens in a proper consultation process. And also the track-record of the governmentÖ [63] And then the complete denial that there is any scientific evidence of health risks and so on [64]. So we're hoping that there may be a way to overcome this dysfunction in our social system, in our citizens and our governance, by engaging the food producers, the farmers, and the restaurants, and the people who really believe and have a vested economic interest in working with what you're doing – the Food Island – and make the policy makers and the other parts of the Irish government understand that in economic terms alone – even if you don't look at the environment and health risks – it makes complete sense for us to keep what we have, which is a green image, the lowest contamination of dioxins in the topsoil, and a GM-free, nuclear-free and incinerator-free country. We think that would be of huge economic value for the future of Irish food exports.

Muiris Kennedy:

Yeah, I think what you're saying is obviously a valid point.

But again, at the outset, I said we're, we're the market and promotion development, we're not in the regulatory régime. I do know that it's our relevant department, and they are, in turn, also, eh, I suppose restricted or they have to, to abide by the European legislation [65].

And they're, in terms of, obviously, signed up to the, we're all, in Europe, twenty-five countries now, and we're, and, eh, we're, we're there since 1973. But just one point, Michael, is I think Irish farmers and food producers are very clever and sharp, and we spend a lot of time trying to pick up what consumers are looking for, what's driving consumers.

And at the moment there is no appetite, certainly, for any GMO-type products in the European market. [66]

And that's 90% of where we're... Now we're just tracking what the consumers are looking for: they want convenience, they want more knowledge, more awareness about local produce, regional foods or whatever. So I mean I don't see a kind of a rush into, into farmers moving out of what they're doing, into what is going to be a very very difficult market for any producer to get into, particularly in Europe, whatever.[67]

It's somewhat different in the US, and that's to do with awareness or whatever [68], but, eh, so I think from a positive point of view, in terms of looking at what consumers want, and that's really what we're trying to tell, eh, producers, "This is what consumers are looking for, and this is how consumers are reacting and behaving in the market today." So I don't know if IÖ

Michael O'Callaghan:

Consumers obviously don't want GM food, and the thirty largest food brands and the thirty largest food retailers [in the EU] don't want it! [69]

The problem as we see it is the Irish government's collusion with the World Trade Organisation [70] and the European Commission and the biotech industry to gloss over, mis-represent, misinform, and cover-up the health risks [71], and to promote this myth that GM crops can "co-exist" [72] with conventional and organic farming – even though there's no market for GM food. If the government succeeds, they are going to open the door for GM seeds [73] to be introduced, and GM crops [74]. And all it takes is one farmer to come in with GM rapeseed and five years later you won't be able to have non-GM broccoli, cauliflower, turnips, brussel sprouts, and all that stuff [75], so I'm just asking youÖ

Muiris Kennedy:

Ö making your point.

Michael O'Callaghan:

Ö to relay our concerns to your colleagues. That would be very good.

I know you have to leave in a hurry butÖ

Muiris Kennedy:

To apologise, yeah, 'cause when I was talking to Michael I, we, half [past] two was in kind of my mind or whatever, but it's now half six. I got it wrong, though, I was wrong, I got the timing wrong, so. I had intended originally to stay over for the night but we had people coming in to visit us from abroad and it just didn't work out so I have to head back now, back to Dublin, so anyway I could take one last question, is that, eh,

Woman in audience:

I was just going to say two things. First of all, to say thank you, Michael, for representing the concerns of many of our Irish citizens.

And number two, while you [i.e. Muiris] say it's in other arenas in relation to policy-making, you have your voice – Bord Bía has its voice. I would humbly ask you to inform yourself in relation to all of the points that Michael has made, and simply be proactive about it, with whoever our policy makers are.

Muiris Kennedy:

Yeah. That's a good point. Thank you.

[Applause]

Muiris Kennedy:

On that positive note, can I take my leave? Thank you, thank you very much.


ENDNOTES:

1.

The Future of Food is a documentary film produced and directed by Deborah Koons Garcia, who screened it at the Green Ireland conference. Muiris Kennedy repeatedly refers to her as Dorothy throughout his speech. You can find the transcript of her presentation at www.gmfreeireland.org/conference/trans/dkoonsgarcia.php. Copies of the DVD may be obtained from GM-free Ireland by sending a request to mail@gmfreeireland.org.

2.

None of these Irish global drinks brands, to our knowledge, have a GM-free ingredients policy, although one may presume they don't contain GM ingredients. Carlsberg beer, on the other hand, does have a GM-free policy. Guinness, which is currently losing market share to other brands (especially among the younger consumers) could develop a great advertising campaign by highlighting the fact that its stout is totally GM-free (if this is indeed the case).

3.

Glenisk Organic Ireland is this country's leading producer of organic (and GM-free) milk and yogurt. It was a sponsor of the Green Ireland conference. See transcript of speech by its M.D. Vincent Cleary at www.gmfreeireland.org/conference/trans/vcleary.php. Glenisk reported sales growth of over 10% in 2005. On 19 June 2006, Glenisk announced its new € 7 million partnership deal with Stonyfield Europe, which is 80% owned by France's Groupe Danone, and 20% owned by the US organic firm Stonyfield Farm. The Cleary family holds 63% of the equity and continues the management of the company.

4.

Bord Bía's Quality Assured Scheme (see www.bordbia.ie) enables Irish meat and dairy produce made from livestock which have been fed a GM diet to be positioned and marketed as being of the highest quality, even though the 60 leading European food brands and retailers refuse GM-labeled food and the best retailers, including Marks & Spencer and Italy's largest supermarket chain, Coop Italia, also refuse Irish meat and dairy produce from animals fed a GM diet. For more on GM free brands and retailers see note 21 below. For information on GM animal feed see www.gmfreeireland.org/feed.

5.

Nevin McGuire is a world-renowned Irish chef and owner of the McNean House and Bistro in Blacklion, Co. Cavan. He features regularly on the Open House TV programme on RTE. He is a member of Euro-Toques Ireland (www.eurotoquesirl.org) / the European Community of Chefs, which is opposed to the use of GM ingredients in Irish food.

6.

Ireland's best-known chef, Darina Allen, is totally opposed to GM ingredients. She is the head of Slow Food Ireland (www.slowfoodireland.com) and of the Ballymaloe Cookery School (www.cookingisfun.ie). Slow Food Ireland was a co-sponsor of the Green Ireland Conference.

7.

Jamie Oliver, MBE, is an English celebrity chef and TV presenter who launched a campaign called Feed Me Better which aims to improve Britain's school meals. See www.jamieoliver.com.

8.

Ireland's wild and farmed salmon industries are under imminent threat of being irreversibly wiped out by the introduction of GM salmon into the Atlantic Ocean from the USA and Canada, which can cross-breed with Irish salmon, which would then have to carry a GM label, for which there is no market in the EU. For details see the GM-free Ireland web site section on GM fish at www.gmfreeireland.org/fish.

9.

See transcript of the Green Ireland conference speech by Kate Carmody, who produces raw milk cheese in West Cork at www.gmfreeireland.org/conference/trans/kcarmody.php.

10.

Boxty is a traditional Irish recipe made from potato, flour and milk.

11.

Co. Cavan is a GMO-free zone. See www.gmfreeireland.org/map/counties/cavan.php.

12.

The map of Ireland - the food island may be obtained from Bord Bía by calling + 353 (0)1 614 2289.

13.

Although most Irish cattle and sheep are indeed fed principally on grass, their diet typically also includes animal feed containing GM soya, GM maize gluten, and some crushed GM rapeseed. Farmers who avoid the GM ingredients are already securing higher prices in the export markets. Farmers who fail to avoid GM ingredients are being excluded from some of the largest European buyers including Coop Italia. For more information on how to avoid GM ingredients in the animal food chain see www.gmfreeireland.org/feed.

14.

Regarding the use of animal feedlots in factory farming, see www.themeatrix.com.

15.

Italy's largest supermarket chain, Coop Italia, now refuses Irish meat and dairy produce from animals fed a GM diet. For more on this, see www.gmfreeireland.org/feed.

16.

Féile Bía is a programme initiated by Euro-Toques Ireland / the European Community of Chefs (www.eurotoquesirl.org), the Restaurants Association of Ireland (www.rai.ie) and the Irish Hotels Federation (www.ihf.ie). Info on Féile Bía may be found by following the link at www.bordbia.ie. The programme's purpose is to emphasise the importance of local quality food sourcing in Irish hotels, restaurants, pubs and workplaces. Féile Bía is currently administered by Bord Bía, which claims the programme is "organised in conjunction with the support of the farming community".

But Féile Bía's "support" by the farming community appears to be limited to following the policy of the Irish Farmers Association (www.ifa.com) which favours big food companies over smaller producers, and which has for years publicly denied the fact that has a very hard-line pro-GMO policy both in Ireland and in the EU.

As of September 2006, both Euro-Toques Ireland and the Restaurants Association of Ireland are extremely dissatisfied with Féile Bía's failure to respond their numerous requests to address the contamination of Irish food by GM ingredients and to provide more emphasis on sourcing food from local and artisanal producers. The Restaurants Association of Ireland and Euro-Toques Ireland are members of the GM-free Ireland Network (www.gmfreeireland.org/network/members.php), and are totally opposed to the use of GM foods. These two principal members of Féile Bía have threatened to resign from - and thus effectively terminate - the organisation unless it takes action to prevent further contamination of Irish food chain with GM ingredients.

17.

Fr. Seán McDonagh, SSC, is a Columban missionary Catholic priest and author of the book Patenting Life? Stop! Is corporate greed forcing us to eat genetically modified food? Dominican Publications, Dublin. 2003. ISBN 1-871552-85-0. € 14.99, available from www.dominicanpublications.com. He has worked extensively in the Philippines, where GM seeds and crops are widely opposed by farmers and consumers, including twelve provincial agriculture offices and several NGOs. GM crops are now banned in several of the Philippine islands.

18.

The Dublin Food Co-op, 114-116 Pearse Street, Dublin 2 • www.dublinfoodcoop.com.

19.

The Irish Government's policy on GM issues is theoretically determined by the Department of Agriculture and Food (www.agriculture.gov.ie) and the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (www.environ.ie). But in reality the policy seems to be determined by the agri-biotech industry, via docile unelected bureaucrats in the European Commission and the WTO, and elected Irish Ministers who collude with agbiotech corporate interests. By comparison with the majority of other EU member states, Ireland is totally submissive to the interests of the agri-biotech industry (see note 20) and has in fact played a leading pro-GMO role in European affairs (see note 24 below).

20.

As of July 2006, eight European countries have total or near total bans on GMOs, as do 175 regional governments, 3,500 local authorities and 1,000 smaller areas across 22 EU member states. For details visit the GMO-free Europe web site at www.gmofree-europe.org.

21.

In January 2005, Greenpeace published a detailed report called No Market for GM Labelled Food in Europe, showing that the EU market for GM labelled food products is virtually closed. Europe's top 30 retailers and top 30 food & drink producers have policies and non-GM commitments which reveal a massive international food industry rejection of GM ingredients. This cuts across the industry from food and drink manufacturers to retailers, and includes everything from snacks and ready meals to pet food and beer. The combined total food and drink sales of the 49 companies with a stated non-GM policy in their main market or throughout the EU (27 retailers and 22 food and drink producers) amounts to € 646 billion, more than 60% of the total € 1,069 billion European food and drink sales. Irish food companies doing business internationally need to implement a non-GM policy without delay. You can download this report (2MB PDF file) from www.gmfreeireland.org/downloads/NoMarketForGMFood.pdf.

In September 2005, Consumers International (www.consumersinternational.org) held a major international conference in Bologna, Italy, where they made an appeal to the EC for caution over contamination from genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Consumers International GM Campaign Manager David Cuming said: "Stop GMO contamination - it can happen quickly and over vast areas and is irreversible. In places, like Italy, where there are a lot of small farms with traditional and organic crops, 'co-existence' is probably impossible without removing the freedom of consumers and farmers to choose." David Cuming advised "All countries worldwide must introduce strict rules to prevent contamination, and allow for GM-free zones, before allowing GMOs in their countries. The EC must wait until they have completed the full review of "co-existence" in Europe before approving new GMO crops."

Prof. Ignacio Chapela, leading expert on GMOs told the conference "'Co-existence'" of GMOs and GM-free plants is biologically impossible. If we keep thinking like this it won't be a question of - if contamination will occur: It will be a question of when and how much? We do not have the political will, the technical capacity or the independence of thought to deal with 'co-existence'"; neither to monitor its development, nor to remedy its consequences. Proposed biosafety and bioethical frameworks will not prevent contamination." GMO and consumer experts from Canada, USA, Brazil, Thailand, Zambia, Austria, Italy and UK presented their position on "co-existence", contamination and GM-free zones at the conference in Bologna.

22.

Under the Presidency of George W. Bush, the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has been taken over by the biotech industry. For details see note 70 below.

23.

Far from not "particularly going out" to say that Ireland is still free of GM farming, Bord Bía makes a point of avoiding any mention of GM contamination of Irish food in any of its public documents - despite numerous requests to address the issue. Bord Bía also has a documented track record of caving in to agri-biotech industry pressure on GM food.

24.

The Irish Government's hard-line pro-GMO policy (see also notes 54 and 55 below):

(a) Fianna Fáil reversed its 1997 pre-election promise never to allow GM food and crops in Ireland after Bertie Ahern's meetings with US National Security Adviser Sandy Berger on St. Patrick's Day 1998 (see notes 61 and 62 below).

(b) Ireland was responsible for ending the EU's four-year de facto embargo on GM crops under its presidency of the European Parliament in 2004, to the fury of the majority of EU Member States.

(c) Ireland has never voted against legalising GM crops in the European Council of Ministers on some 12 occasions as of July 2006 (see note 65 below).

(d) The Government has granted numerous patents on GMO seeds and crops, thus paving the way for a massive transfer of ownership of Irish agricultural seeds from farmers to foreign transnational agri-biotech corporations - the biggest conceivable rip-off in the history of the irish State. For more information about the implications of crop patents, see the Green Ireland Conference speeches by Dr. Vandana Shiva (www.gmfreeireland.org/conference/trans/V.Shiva.pdf) and Percy Schmeiser (www.gmfreeireland.org/conference/trans/P.Scheiser.pdf).

(e) The Government has authorised the placing on the market of animal feed and food containing GM ingredients, despite mounting scientific evidence of deaths and disease attributable to GM ingredients in laboratory animals, farm animals and the human population. For details, see www.gmfreeireland.org/health.

(f) The Government has approved the importation of live GMO seeds, despite an Oireachtas debate convened on 24 November 2004 by the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Environment and Local Government. The principal item on the agenda was how Ireland should vote on the placing on the market of Monsanto's GT73 genetically modified oilseed rape for use as animal feed (even though it consists of live GMO seeds which will inevitably produce a crop. Environment Minister Dick Roche ignored the GM-free Ireland Network's advice to vote NO, and abstained from voting, thus contributing to the lack of a Qualified Majority vote which then enabled the College of Commissioners to legalise GT73 on 30 September 2005.

• briefing paper: www.gmfreeireland.org/resources/briefings/GMFIbriefing1.pdf.

• debate transcript: www.gmfreeireland.org/downloads/GMO-24november2004.pdf.

• press release issued by the GM-free Ireland Network on 2 September 2005: www.gmfreeireland.org/press/GMFI21.pdf.

(g) The government continues to favour the introduction of GM food and farming despite an Oireachtas debate which led to unanimous cross-party opposition from TDs and Senators. This debate was convened on 15 June 2005 by the Joint Oireachtas Committee on European Affairs and the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Environment and Local Government. The principal item on the agenda was how Ireland should vote on the European Commission's request to revoke national bans on GM maize and rapeseed crops put in place by Austria, Luxembourg, France, Greece and Germany since 1997. The second item on the agenda was on whether Irish farming should conserve its GMO-free status. Senators and TDs gave unanimous cross-party support for the sovereign right of member states to ban specific GM products when there are questions over their safety, and urged Environment Minister Dick Roche to support the existing bans. As a result, Ireland changed its recent policy of abstaining, when Roche voted against the EC proposals at the Council of Ministers meeting on 24 June, as 22 out of the 25 EU member states rejected the EC proposals. A second outcome of the debate was that many Senators and TDs also supported the call for Ireland to remain free of GM seeds and crops:

GM-free Ireland Network briefing paper (724kb PDF file): www.gmfreeireland.org/resources/briefings/GMFIbriefing2.pdf.

Full transcript of the debate (520kb PDF file): www.gmfreeireland.org/downloads/GMO-15June2005.pdf.

(h) Biotech industry spin doctors have penetated the highest levels of Irish regulatory bodies, academia, and the media. For details see note 54 below.

(i) The Government has fully backed the legally flawed and non-binding European Commission Recommendation 2003/556/EC on "guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices to ensure the coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming." www.gmfreeireland.org/coexistence/2003-556Guidelines.pdf.

The Recommendation asks Member States to put in place legal measures for "co-existence" which should not go further than to keep GM contamination of non-GM and organic crops below the threshold set down in European GM labelling legislation (currently 0.9 per cent). It also says that measures should ignore environmental concerns and be limited to economic issues. The problem is that if member states put in place measures, like separation distances, based on this guidance, widespread GM contamination of crops and food is certain to occur. This highlights the lengths the Government will go to back the biotech industry and pave the way for GM crops to be grown in Ireland. The only way biotech companies will be able to grow their crops on a large scale is to allow widespread GM contamination of conventional and organic crops. And this is exactly what the Irish Government is preparing to do.

The EC Recommendation advised Member Status to conduct a public consultation process under EU rules whereby member states can put in place measures to prevent GM contamination of non-GM crops. But under European food labelling rules, accidental GM contamination of up to 0.9 per cent is allowed before foods have to be labelled as GM. The Irish Government has taken this to mean that 0.9 per cent GM contamination in conventional, and potentially even in organic, crops is acceptable.

On 21 March 2005, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, GeneWatch UK, Which? and Five Year Freeze issued a joint press release (www.gmfreeireland.org/coexistence/FOE/CoexLegallyFlawed.pdf) stating that this recommendation is legally flawed and called for it to be withdrawn. A legal opinion (www.gmfreeireland.org/coexistence/FOE/CoexLasok.pdf) by leading European lawyer Paul Lasok QC was presented to the EC Commissioners for Agriculture, Environment and Consumers, condemning the EC position as "fundamentally flawed" and criticising the UK Government for following this approach, which has no basis in community legislation and is legally incorrect. The opinion concludes:

"Öthe Recommendation is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the relevant legal provisions, and risks advising Member States to adopt coexistence measures that are incompatible with the aims of the legislation or which would result in preventing, in practice, the use of the "organic" label and the reliance on the GM labelling exemption."

Friends of the Earth's GM campaigner, Clare Oxborrow said:

"This legal opinion destroys the European Commission's position on GM crop coexistence with non-GM crops. Countries around Europe are already putting in place laws to control contamination from GM crops, but they are being misguided by flawed advice. There is a growing movement for GM free areas in Europe, and consumer demand for GM free food remains as strong as ever. The Commission must now ditch its misleading guidance and replace it with tough, EU-wide laws that will truly protect our choice for GM-free food, our health and the environment from the threat of GM crops."

Sue Davies, Chief Policy Officer, Which? said:

"The EC's Recommendation on coexistence takes GM contamination of up to 0.9 per cent as its starting point and therefore restricts people's ability to have meaningful choice between GM, non GM and organic crops. The legal advice offered today suggests that the European Commission and member states should be aiming to minimize contamination when establishing rules for how GM crops should be grown."

Peter Melchett, Policy Director of The Soil Association said:

"One reason consumers choose organic food is to avoid eating GM products, yet the European Commission is trying, we believe illegally, to impose rules that could mean almost one in every hundred mouthfuls of organic food was actually GM food, with no requirement to tell people what they are really eating."

Sarah North GM Campaigner for Greenpeace said:

"The European Commission may have to go back to the drawing board with GM crops now. If their assumptions about how to stop contamination between GM and normal crops are wrong, then it follows that subsequent decisions to allow some GM crops to be grown in Europe and proposals for permissible levels of GM contamination of regular seeds may also be flawed. Our legal opinion could stop the Commission disregarding their own legislation and forcing GM crops into Europe on a remiss premise."

(j) The Irish Government accepted the flawed EC Recommendation without objection. The Department of Trade and Enterprise then set up an inter-agency Working Group managed by the Department of Agriculture and Food to devise a national strategy to promote the "co-existence" of GM crops. The Working Group falsely claimed it was under a legal obligation from the EC to complete the strategy by early 2005, but only completed its first draft of in December of that year, after refusing numerous requests from stakeholders to provide sufficient time for them to make informed submissions.

The Minister for Agriculture and Food, Mary Coughlan, published the "Report on Coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in Ireland on 7 December 2005, which recommended absurdly inadequate "separation distances" between GM and conventional crops and - astoundingly, proposed allowing the release of GM crops (with all the irreversible contamination this would create) prior to the setting up of a liability regime to pay for the resulting economic losses - i.e. contaminate first, legislate later! Furthermore, the Minister set a deadline for stakeholders to submit "observations" on the Report at 31 January 2006, only 7 weeks after the report's publication (with Christmas in between). On 14 February 2006, following pressure from the GM-free Ireland Network, the Dept. of Agriculture extended the deadline to 31 March 2006.

But in July 2006, the Working Group said that its proposals for the related legislation on "co-existence", would not be ready until at least the end of 2006 or mid 2007 pending discussions with the Department of Finance regarding the setting up compensation fund for contaminated farmers who either lose market share or are forced out of business as a result of the Government's policy!

Moreover, the consultation process excluded 83% of the stakeholder groups (including relevant government agencies, all County and Town Councils, foresters, food producers, food exporters, chefs, restaurants, retailers and Non Governmental Organisations who have the greatest expertise and/or will be most directly affected by any introduction of GM crops on this island). See full dossier at www.gmfreeireland.org/coexistence.

This undemocratic public consultation process breaches the requirements of the Aarhus Convention on public participation in environmental decision-making to which Ireland and the EU are both a party. For more on the Aarhus Convention, see note 64 below.

(k) The Irish Goverment failed to ensure that the country's three largest farming organisations participate in the main consultation process.

In an editorial in the February 2006 issue of the Irish Farmers Monthly magazine (www.irishfarmersjournal.ie), Editor Margaret Donnelly slammed the Irish Farmers Association (www.ifa.ie), the Irish Creamery and Milk Suppliers Association (www.icmsa.ie) and Macra na Feirme (www.macra.ie) for failing to make any submissions on the government's plans to introdce GM crops. "The three farming organisations that claim to represent the vast majority of farmers between them are opting out of laying their cards on the table now... It's even more worrying to hear that the biggest farming lobby group in the country (the IFA) doesn't even have a policy on GM crops... The biggest danger with going down the GM route... is that there is no going back. So if we go down the GM route will Bord Bía have to consider changing its name to Ireland - the GM Food island?" www.gmfreeireland.org/ifm/index.php.

Note that the IFA management has for years misled its own members and the general public by repeatedly claiming that it had "no policy" on GM farming, while in reality it has a very strong pro-GM policy thinly veiled in the numerous references and articles published in the Irish Farmers Journal.

The IFA is a member of COPA-COGECA (Committee of Professional Agricultural Organisations in the EU + General Confederation of Agricultural Co-operatives in the EU), the largest and most influential farming organisation in Europe.

Few IFA members know that COPA-COGECA regularly lobbies the Council of Ministers, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions for EC legislation to approve GM seeds and crops and to prohibit the member states from establishing GMO-free zones.

Even fewer IFA members know that Donal Cashman (the former IFA President and Board member of the Agricultural Trust which owns the Irish Farmers Journal) is the President of COGECA and a former Vice-President of COPA.

Sources in Brussels say that Donal Cashman and the IFA have never voted against COPA-COGECA's pro-GMO policies, which are vigorously opposed by some of its other members including leading farming organisations in Italy (where GMO seeds and crops are illegal) and in Spain (where farmers contaminated with GMOs are burning their crops to try to get rid of the infestation).

The IFA's intimate relationship with Europe's largest pro-GMO lobby group, and the Farmers Journal's one-sided coverage of GMO seeds and crops support the view that IFA leadership has a secret policy to support the giant agri-biotech companies who are determined to grab, patent, and control the world's agricultural seed supply. Whoever controls the seeds controls the food.

The IFA finally came out of the closet in the 13 May 2006 issue of the Irish Farmers Journal which announced the IFA's blueprint for the future of farming with a ringing endorsement that "... GM technology can have positive implications for agriculture and food production, including control of animal and plant disease and improved productivity."

The blueprint claims that "Decisions on the use and release of GMO products are taken at EU level and Ireland cannot adopt a separate position", even though EU law fully allows national bans on specific GM crops, and despite the fact that 8 European countries, 175 regional governments, and 3,500 local authorities in 22 EU member states have already stood up to the WTO and the EC by adopting separate positions to outlaw, restrict, or place moratoria on GMO seeds and crops.

Finally, the IFA blueprint makes the laudable recommendation that "EU legislation must ensure that plant and animal varieties are not patentable", apparently unaware that the WTO's TRIPS agreement has already enabled the EU and Irish Patent Offices to grant thousands of such patents, including 20 per cent of the genes in the human body!

25.

The Restaurants Association of Ireland (www.rai.ie) is opposed to the use of GM ingredients and is a member of the GM-free Ireland Network. See note 16 above.

26.

Euro-Toques Ireland / the European Commission of Chefs (www.eurotoquesirl.org) is also opposed to the use of GM ingredients and is a prominent member of the GM-free Ireland Network. See note 16 above.

27.

Here for the third time Muiris Kennedy avoids answering the question that was asked by Michael O'Callaghan; the straight answer he should have given is that Bord Bía routinely awards the Quality Assured label to Irish food produced from animals that have been fed on a GM diet (most non-organic Irish meat and dairy produce fall into this category) and probably also to some foods containing GM ingredients.

28.

Since 1997, EU legislation requires that labelling of GM food is mandatory for products that consist of GMO or contain GMO and products derived from GMO but no longer containing GMO if there is still DNA or protein resulting from the genetic modification present. The latest regulation concerning GMO Labelling is Regulation (EC) 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC were published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

However, a gaping loophole in EU law means that meat and dairy produce from animals that have been fed on GM ingredients remains unlabelled.

29.

Here Muiris Kennedy gives the impression that Ireland is leading Europe in the demand for proper labeling of GM food, which is the opposite of the truth.

30.

For example, an illegal shipment of 2,546 tonnes of genetically modified Bt10 maize was unloaded at Greenore, Co. Louth on 26 May 2005. It was intercepted because the US authorities were required by the EC to alert EU Member States of any ships carrying the illegal cargo.

The Bt10 maize, manufactured by Syngenta, has been mislabelled since 2001 as a legal variety called Bt11. Bt10 maize produces its own pesticide and is prohibited world-wide because it contains an antibiotic resistance gene with threatens the health of animals and humans.

In an attempt to cover-up the scandal, the Irish Department of Agriculture and Food issued a press release which referred to the illegal Bt10 shipment as a "sample", failing to disclose the quantity of 2,546 tonnes - enough to fill over 85 lorries, and contaminate over six million cattle and sheep.

But instead of returning the illegal cargo to the sender in the USA, Department of Agriculture officials arrived on the scene after the shipment had already been brought ashore. Eyewitnesses say it was improperly unloaded through the same equipment, vehicles and storage facilities used for other animal feed, which may thus be cross-contaminated. Dr. Pat O'Mahony of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland said "there's no danger that we can see, it's just illegal that's all". Although substantial spillage of the dangerous animal feed has likely been consumed by rats, mice, seagulls, migratory birds and fish, the Environmental Protection Agency said animal feed is not their responsibility.

In a letter responding to Green Party leader Trevor Sargent's questions in the Dáil, Agriculture Minister Mary Coughlan stated on 24 June: "Responsibility for disposal of this material rests with the importer. The importer has been requested to submit proposals for disposal of the material and has responded saying that they are currently exploring three options, viz incineration abroad; return to country of origin or possible composting within Ireland, the latter which would require the consent of the EPA." Download letter www.gmfreeireland.org/scandal/MaryCoughlan-Bt10.pdf (376k PDF file).

The illegal cargo was imported by Arkady Feed Ltd in Dublin, aboard the Helena Oldendorff, a bulk carrier (managed by Oldendorff Carriers of Lübeck and chartered by Alfred Toeper of Hamburg, Germany) sailing under a Liberian flag. Many months later it was reportedly shipped to the Netherlands for incineration there.

This was the first known case of the banned biotech maize arriving in the EU since emergency measures were recently adopted by the EC to prevent Bt10 seeping through European borders. The fact that so many tonnes arrived in a single shipment long after the EU required the USA to terminate the practice, raises the question of how many hundred thousand tonnes of mislabelled Bt10 GM feed may have been fraudulently sold to Irish cattle and sheep farmers - and consumed by Irish livestock and people - over the past 4 years or more.

The point here is that nobody knows how much Irish dairy, beef and lamb produce contaminated by Bt10 has been consumed, or exported under Ireland's clean green food island image since 2001. Press release: www.gmfreeireland.org/scandal/index.php.

31.

Misleading Irish honey claims: see http://fsai.ie/news/press/pr_06/pr20060531.asp.

32.

According to the Federation of Irish Beekeeping Associations, barrels of Canadian honey produced from GM oilseed rape flowers are being imported into Ireland, then filtered to remove the incriminating GM pollen, and finally blended with a bucket-full of Irish honey containing non-GM pollen, before being fraudulently sold as non-GM "Irish Honey."

33.

The European Environment Bureau is a federation of more than 140 environmental citizens' organisations based in all EU Member States and most Accession Countries, as well as in a few neighbouring countries. These organisations range from local and national, to European and international. The aim of the EEB is to protect and improve the environment of Europe and to enable the citizens of Europe to play their part in achieving that goal. See www.eeb.org for details.

34.

An Taisce / the National Trust for Ireland is Ireland's leading environmental organisation. It co-hosted the Green Ireland Conference at Kilkenny Castle in 2006. For details see www.antaisce.org.

35.

Far from having a good environmental reputation in the international scene, Ireland is in breach of numerous environmental EC Directives, is way in excess of its greenhouse gas emissions agreed under the Kyoto Protocol, and was ranked by the Ecological Footprint Network as the world's fifth least environmentally sustainable country in 2005, based on per capita consumption of resources and production of waste in relation to the available ecological space. For details see the Ecological Footprint Network web site at www.footprintnetwork.org.

In relation to GM policy, the current Irish Government has given our country one of the worst reputations in Europe for having played a key role in ending the European de facto embargo on GMOs under the Irish Presidency of the EU in 1004, and for never having voted against the legalisation of GM crops on some 12 occasions when it could have done so. For details see notes 59 and 63 below.

36.

However, Bord Bía's leadership failure on GM contamination is rapidly contributing to the loss of credibility of the image of Ireland - the food island.

37.

Food Pyramid: The original food guiding pyramid, informally known as the food pyramid, was a nutrition guide created by the USDA. For details look up the topic on Wikepedia at www.wikipedia.org.

38.

Irish farmers release thousands of tonnes of pesticides and weedkillers into the environment each year, although the amounts are declining as part of CAP reform.

According to Conor Meade, a pro-GMO-researcher at Teagasc, 2,560 tonnes of pesticides were released by Irish farmers in 2000. This figure does not include pesticides released by Coilte and other forestry groups, or pesticides released by proprietors of golf courses, county and town councils, and domestic use.

We have no figures for the amounts of weedkillers.

But the most common weedkiller used in Ireland, Roundup (manufactured by Monsanto) is of particular concern. On 7 March 2005, Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Prof. Joe Cummins of the Independent Science Panel (www.indsp.org) called for urgent regulatory review of this most widely used herbicide in the light of new scientific evidence that is is far more toxic than previously known as borne out by many reports of toxicities associated with the herbicide reviewed in the Independent Science Panel Report, The Case for a GM-free Sustainable World (www.indsp.org/A GM-Free Sustainable World.pdf). For more detailed information on the toxicity of Roundup, see www.i-sis.org.uk/GTARW.php.

A recent study of Roundup presents new evidence that the glyphosate-based herbicide is far more toxic than the active ingredient alone. The study, published in the June 2005 issue of Environmental Health Perspectives, reports glyphosate toxicity to human placental cells within hours of exposure, at levels ten times lower than those found in agricultural use. The researchers also tested glyphosate and Roundup at lower concentrations for effects on sexual hormones, reporting effects at very low levels. This suggests that dilution with other ingredients in Roundup may, in fact, facilitate glyphosate's hormonal impacts.

Roundup, produced by Monsanto, is a mixture of glyphosate and other chemicals (commonly referred to as "inerts") designed to increase the herbicide's penetration into the target and its toxic effect. Since inerts are not listed as "active ingredients" the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)does not assess their health or environmental impacts, despite the fact that more than 300 chemicals on EPA's list of pesticide inert ingredients are or were once registered as pesticide active ingredients, and that inert ingredients often account for more than 50% of the pesticide product by volume.

The evidence presented in the recent study is supported by earlier laboratory studies connecting glyphosate with reproductive harm, including damaged DNA in mice and abnormal chromosomes in human blood. Evidence from epidemiological studies has also linked exposure to the herbicide with increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and laboratory studies have now begun to hone in on the mechanism by which the chemical acts on cell division to cause cancer. A Canadian study has linked glyphosate exposure in the three months before conception with increased risk for miscarriage and a 2002 study in Minnesota connected glyphosate exposure in farm families with increased incidence of attention deficit disorder.

Studies have also documented glyphosate's toxicity to wildlife and especially to amphibians. Recently, studies conducted in small ponds with a variety of aquatic populations have presented evidence that levels of glyphosate currently applied can be highly lethal to many species of amphibians.

Glyphosate is the world's most commonly used agricultural pesticide, and the second most-applied residential pesticide in the U.S. Recent evidence notwithstanding, glyphosate is considered less hazardous than other herbicides, an attitude that has increased the pesticide's use and desensitized policymakers to its impacts. The spraying program in Colombia to eradicate coca and opium poppy-the raw materials for cocaine and heroin-is one example. A mixture of glyphosate and several inerts has been sprayed aerially over more than 1.3 million acres of farm, range and forest lands in that biologically diverse nation for five years. The U.S. Drug Czar recently noted that despite the spraying, which is funded by the U.S. government, the number of hectares in coca production has remained essentially unchanged. A report on the impacts of the spraying produced for the Organization of American States has been sharply criticized by AIDA, an environmental organization, because the analysis failed to assess the impacts of deforestation resulting from movement of illicit crops into previously forested areas, adverse effects on endangered and endemic species, substantial collateral loss of food crops, livestock and fish, and human health effects. Authorization of next year's funding for the spray program is now underway in the U.S. Congress, where the Senate Appropriations Committee complained in a non-binding narrative report, "The Committee is increasingly concerned ... that the aerial eradication program is falling far short of predictions and that coca cultivation is shifting to new locations."

The herbicide is used in forestry in North America to reduce grasses, shrubs and trees that compete with commercial timber trees. Glyphosate is also widely introduced into the environment and the human food chain through cultivation of transgenic, or genetically engineered crops that are tolerant to the herbicide and contain glyphosate residues. "Roundup Ready" crops have been responsible for increased use of the herbicide in recent years. Monsanto's sales of glyphosate have expanded approximately 20% each year through the 1990s, accounting for 67% of the company's total sales in 200l. The US EPA estimates glyphosate use in the U.S. is 103-113 million pounds annually.

39.

According to the Survey of Fertiliser use from 2001-2003 for Grassland and Arable Crops published by the Irish Government farm advisory body Teagasc (www.teagasc.ie) in 2005, Irish farmers in 2003 released 543,048 tonnes of artificial fertilisers into the environment for grassland and arable crops, of which 388,080 tonnes of Nitrogen (down from 428,826 tonnes in 1995), 111,136 tonnes of Potassium (down from 150,543 tonnes in 1995), and 43,832 tonnes of Phosphorus (down from 62,410 tonnes in 1995). These figures do not include fertiliser used in forestry, golf courses, gardens, and by local authorities.

40.

Bord Bía's Quality Assured scheme for horticulture also fails to address the issue of GM contamination, which is astonishing in view of the size of the Irish horticulture industry and the number of jobs it provides. According to Bord Bía's website (July 2006):

"The Irish horticultural industry has a farm gate value of EUR 406.5 million and makes a very significant contribution to the Irish gross agricultural output. In terms of gross agricultural commodity output, horticulture is positioned third after cattle and milk. Horticulture also generates a significant contribution at retail level where Irish consumers spend EUR 801.6 million on fresh fruit, vegetables and potatoes, second only to dairy produce. A further EUR 1.1 billion is spent on the procurement of fruit, vegetables and potatoes within the Irish foodservice industry.

On the non-food side of horticulture the Irish consumer is spending EUR 431 million on plants and cut flowers for the home and on garden products. This figure excludes the corporate spending on landscaping of housing developments, commercial property, roadside planting or interior landscaping. Therefore, it is estimated that the total consumer spend on horticultural products is in excess of EUR 2.33 billion annually.

The horticultural industry is labour intensive when compared to other agricultural sectors. This indigenous industry employs approximately 18,500 across the food and non food areas, this employment is broadly based across the country.

There are areas of specialisation in a number of regions based on climatic and soil suitability. This extensive production base is channelled through sophisticated supply chains for retail, service and export markets. The industry feeds through a series of prepack, wholesale, preparation and processing links before the end customer uses the final products.

The industry has always operated in an open market without direct agricultural subsidies or quota restrictions. This market is increasingly international and competitive, and ongoing development of the horticultural industry is dependent on its ability to maintain and extend competitive advantages in this environment.

Two sectors of Irish horticulture, in particular, are important sources of foreign revenue. Three quarters of all mushroom production or some EUR 100 million is exported annually. Almost EUR 14 million of non-food horticultural products i.e. nursery stock, cut foliage, bulbs, flowers and Christmas trees are also exported, mainly to the UK and Northern Ireland."

41.

Ireland's has three native organic certification bodies: the Irish Organic Farmers and Growers Association (www.iofga.org), the Organic Trust (www.organic-trust.org), and the much smaller Demeter Organic Standards Ltd (www.demeter.ie) for the members of the Bio Dynamic Agricultural Association in Ireland (http://web697.vbox-01.inode.at/bdaai/index.html). All three are members of the GM-free Ireland Network. Some farmers in Northern Ireland are certified by the Soil Association (www.soilassociation.org).

42.

Western Organic Network: www.westernorganicnetwork.com.

43.

Leitrim Organic Farmers Coop: www.leitrimorganic.com.

44.

Certified organic Irish beef is regarded as the amongst the very best in Europe because of its superior grass-fed taste and colour.

45.

Slaney Foods International Ltd (www.slaney.com) is a leading exporter of Irish lamb and beef. Its Managing Director, Rory Fanning, was a participant in the Green Ireland conference.

46.

In 2002, Tesco removed GM ingredients from all Tesco brand products, and requested all its suppliers of fresh meat to remove GM soya and maize from animal feed used in Tesco's fresh meat supply chain in the UK, following customer research which found that more than 76% of Tesco customers in the UK want meat reared on a non-GM diet. In addition, in 2002 it also requested all its suppliers of fresh poultry, eggs, pork, fish, fresh sausage meat, bacon, and dairy produce to exclude GM ingredients from the animal food chain.

47.

Most non-organic Irish meat and dairy produce still comes from animals whose diet includes GM soya, GM maize gluten, and some GM oilseed rape, thus resulting in lower premia and/or exclusion from prime markets in Europe. For details see www.gmfreeireland.org/feed.

48.

Muiris Kennedy here tries to sideline the need for a high level discussion with stakeholders on GM contamination by restricting it to the organic sector, whereas most GM contamination of the irish food chain is coming in via the GM animal feed that is being sold to conventional farmers.

Note that the Organic Market Development Group, which is run by the Department of Agriculture and Food, has repeatedly avoided taking a position on GM crops, despite numerous requests to do so by Irish organic farming groups which will lose their organic certification and - and thus their Constitutional right to earn a livelihood - if the current Government succeeds in its plans to introduce GM crops in Ireland, which would inevitably contaminate them.

49.

GM contamination affects all farmers and food producers, whether they are conventional or organic. See notes 2, 4, 8, 13, 15, 16, 21, 25, 26, 28, 30, 31 35, 40, 45, 46, and 47, above, and notes 52, 57, 61, 63, 64, 73, 74, 75 and 77 below.

50.

Here Muiris Kennedy makes a second attempt to sideline the issue as being of primary relevance to the organic sector, which only constitutes 1% of Irish farmers.

51.

This clear offer by Muiris Kennedy to help set up a meeting between Bord Bía, farming groups and food producers to discuss the implications of GM food and farming was immediately denied by him the day after the conference, on 19 June 2006, in response to an email from a minor biotech industry lobbyist who lives in Canada.

The latter had in the previous week accused Board Bía of "using Irish tax payers money to sponsor an upcoming conference organized by the anti-GM food group GM Free Ireland", which caused Muiris Kennedy to withdraw Bord Bía's € 1,000 in sponsorship for the event, and then deny having made the offer in the first place.

In Muiris Kennedy's email response to the lobbyist on 19 June, he wrote:

"Regarding the suggestion that I would set up a meeting with Retailers, and those involved in the Area, what I said at the conference was in response to a question from John Brennan of Leitrim Organic Farmers Co-op from the floor about the marketing of Organics. My response was that Bord Bia does not have any role in the the area of Food policy but there is A specific group set up called "Oganic Market Development Group" which comprises all of The bodies involved in the sector and this would be a more appropriate forum to discuss these Type of issues. I did not undertake to set up any meetings." [spelling mistakes in original]

The lobbyist then used Muiris Kennedy's denial of Bord Bia's agreed sponsorship of the event, and his later denial of having offered to help arrange a meeting to discuss the GM issue, to publicly accuse Michael O'Callaghan and the GM-free Ireland Network of deception and lies designed to deceive prospective sponsors. This misinformation was subsequently disseminated to the Irish public by a journalist called Joe Barry in an article by him entitled "Crackpot assertions: read on" published in the Irish Independent on 8 August 2006. The article concludes with the sentence "For an another viewpoint check out www.gmoireland.blogspot.com where at least you will be able to enjoy an alternative opinion to that of the anti-everything lobby."

52.

Ireland's largest beef exporters now offers higher prices for beef from animals whose diet is GM free. These include the Kepak Group (www.kepak.com), the Kildare Chilling Company (a member of the GM-free Ireland Network), and TLT International.

TLT International, based in Mullingar, Co. Westmeath, exports 1,200 - 1,500 non-GMO fed live store-cattle per month, mostly to Northern Italy. These are fed on grass, and silage from non-GMO barley grown on TLT's own farm near Mullingar, because Italy's largest supermarket chain, Coop Italia, now refuses Irish meat fed on a GM diet.

In December 2006, the Silver Pail Dairy in Co. Cork secured a three-year multi-million Euro deal to supply the world's largest ice-cream maker Baskin-Robbins, with GM-free ice cream sourced from Irish farmers who avoid using GM ingredients to feed their cows. The Irish GM-free ice cream is destined for Baskin-Robbins outlets across the European market where consumers don't want American ice cream contaminated with GM ingredients and/or sourced from cattle fed a GM diet. For details see Irish Times article of 24 January at www.gmfreeireland.org/news/2006/jan.php#silver.

It is worth noting that the above-mentioned Irish food exporters are securing higher prices for meat and dairy produce from animals fed on a GM-free diet, despite the fact that a biotech industry-backed loophole in EU law does not require meat, poultry, and dairy produce from animals fed on a GM diet to carry a GM label.

This loophole is directly responsible for the continued growing and importation of GMO crops for animal feed. As a result, 20 million tonnes of dangerous and unnecessary GM ingredients enter the EU food chain each year, without the public being informed; Irish consumers are inadvertently supporting the cultivation of GMOs for animal feed (typically involving massive deforestation and displacement of peasant farmers in Brazil or Argentina); and Irish farmers risk losing their fair share of the growing international market for safe GM-free food. The fundamental right of EU citizens to information requires mandatory labelling of animal products based on GMOs now. Please sign the Greenpeace petition to close the loophole through a petition to the EC which demands mandatory labelling for food produce derived from animals fed on GM feed at https://ctk.greenpeace.org/genetic-engineering.

53.

See video of the Prime Time's 31 March 2005 broadcast investigation of the GMO controversy which included a live debate with Jeffrey M. Smith (author of Seeds of Deception: exposing corporate and government lies about the safety of genetically engineered food,); Simon Barber (Director of Biotechnology, EuropaBio); Prof. David McConnell, Smurfit Institute of Genetics, TCD; Co-chair EAGLES - European Action on Global Life Sciences; Chair, Irish Times Trust); and Michael O'Callaghan, Co-ordinator, GM-free Ireland Network. You can match a video recording of the show on the web at http://dynamic.rte.ie/av/2035420.smil (if you have RealPlayer software on your computer).

54.

Biotech industry lobbyists and spin-doctors have penetrated the highest levels of Irish regulatory bodies, academia, and the media:

• The official Irish Government delegation to the World Trade Organisation talks in Hong Kong and Cancún included Monsanto Services International's Director of Government Affairs for Europe-Africa), Mella Frewen, who is not even an irish citizen! This was revealed by Senator David Norris at a GM-free Ireland press conference on 22 February 2006 (www.gmfreeireland.org/potato/pressconference.php).

• The CEO of the Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dr. John O'Brien, whose advice is required for any Irish vote on GMOs in the EC, is a former Director of the International Life Sciences Institute, a global biotech front group based in Washington DC and Paris. ILSI was accused of hiding its corporate funding sources in order to obtain UN accreditation as a Non Governmental Organisation, and thus infiltrate scientific committees of the WHO and the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation to downplay scientific evidence of the links between high levels of sugar in junk food and childhood obesity and diabetes. Dr. O'Brien routinely denies the existence of the mounting scientific evidence of the health risks of GM foods.

• The Chairman of the Irish Times Trust and founder of the Smurfit Institute of Genetics at Trinity Collage Dublín, Prof. David McConnell also routinely accuses people's opposition to genetically modified food as "anti-science". He himself publicly denles the existente of all the scientific evidence of health and environmental risks of GM food and crops, and regularly trots out the false claim that the GM-free Ireland Network is opposed to the production of insulin and other medicines by GM bacteria in sealed vats in secure laboratories. This is not surprising because Prof. McConnell is also the Co-Vice Chairman of the biotech industry lobby group EAGLES (European Action on Global Life Sciences) and a member of the Executive Board of the European Federation of Biotechnology. Both of these lobby groups, as well as the Smurfit Institute of Genetics at TCD itself, are funded by the agri-biotech industry.

• The Irish Council for Bioethics appears to be a thinly veiled front group to promote GM food. Its chairman, Dermot Gleeson; he is also the Chair of Allied Irish Banks (AIB), a former Governor of the BBC from 2000 to 2004, and a current Non-Executive Director of Independent News & Media Plc.

On 28 November 2005, the Bioethics Council published a 74-page report called "Genetically Modified Crops and Food: Threat or Opportunity for Ireland?" which reads like it was written by Monsanto spin-doctors. It concludes that GMO crops "hold a great deal of promise" and are not "morally objectionable". Amusingly, the Report annex includes the results of the Council's own public consultation on GMOs which reveals that the vast majority of respondents do not trust the government's safety claims on GMOs and oppose their release in Ireland. The launch event for the report, hosted by the Royal Irish Academy at the Mansion House, was attended by Monsanto Ireland CEO Dr. Patrick O'Reilly and Dermot Gleeson.

55.

Current and former members of the Irish Government who have misled the public on GM issues include:

• Bertie Ahern, who broke his party's pre-election pledge never to allow GM crops in Ireland (see notes 61 and 62 below).

• The Irish President of the European Parliament from 2002 to 2004, Pat Cox, who repeatedly denied the existence of any scientific evidence of GMO health and environmental risks. During the 1980s, he was a current affairs presenter on RTE's Today Tonight programme. In 1989 he was elected MEP for Munster, representing the Progressive Democrats. In 1992 he became TD for Cork South Central, and deputy leader of the PDs in 1993. He was elected president of the ELDR group in the EU Parliament in 1998. In 2006 he was elected President of the European Movement, an international lobby association that "coordinates the efforts of associations and private individuals desiring to work towards the construction of a united Europe". European Movement web site: www.europeanmovement.org. European Movement in Ireland: www.europeanmovement.org. European Movement Ireland's President is the Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, its Chairman is Ruaírí Quinn TD (Labour), and its V